Zapier vs Make vs Integrately: Workflow Automation Audit

If you manage digital workflows in 2025, chances are you’ve bumped into Zapier vs Make (formerly Integromat), vs or Integrately. These tools promise the same thing—automation without code, fewer repetitive tasks, and a smoother business engine.

But they’re not created equal.

I’ve spent a good amount of hands-on time with all three, wiring them into marketing stacks, CRM systems, AI tools, and real-time notifications. Below is my honest, practical breakdown of how they perform today.


⭐ Quick Verdict

  • Zapier = Best for simplicity and rock-solid reliability
  • Make = Best for visual builders, complex workflows & advanced users
  • Integrately = Best for affordability & quick one-click automations

But depending on your business size, technical comfort, and the complexity of your automations, the “winner” can shift.


🔍 Comparison Table Zapier vs Make vs Integrately

FeatureZapierMakeIntegrately
Ease of Use⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Best ForBeginners, SMBsPower users, complex workflowsBudget-conscious users
Workflow StyleLinear “Zap” builderFull visual canvasStep-based, simplified
Integrations7,000+ apps1,500+ apps1,000+ apps
PricingHigherModerateLow
StrengthsReliability, huge app libraryFlexibility, visual automationCost-effective, fast setup
WeaknessesCan get expensiveLearning curveFewer complex options

⚡ Zapier: The Automation Veteran

Zapier is the automation tool most people meet first—and for good reason.
It’s clean, predictable, and incredibly stable.

What I liked

  • Workflows rarely break, even with heavy usage
  • The biggest integration library on the market
  • Perfect for teams who want “set it and forget it” reliability

Zapier shines when you want automation without drama. It just works.

What could be better

The pricing jumps quickly when you need multi-step Zaps or higher task limits. For small businesses, it’s fine; for scaling teams, Zapier can get pricey.


🎛️ Make: Automation Powerhouse for Pros

Make.com is the opposite of Zapier’s simplicity—it’s deeper, more flexible, and wildly visual.

What I liked

  • Gorgeous visual scenario builder
  • Handles branching logic, loops, routers, scheduling, and complex logic
  • More affordable at scale

If you think of automations like flowcharts, Make will feel natural. It gives you control Zapier doesn’t.

What could be better

The learning curve can surprise new users. If you’re not comfortable with logic or multi-layer workflows, the interface may feel overwhelming.


💸 Integrately: Affordable, Simple, and Underrated

Integrately doesn’t get the same attention as Zapier or Make, but it deserves a spot in this comparison—especially for users watching their automation budget.

What I liked

  • Very affordable pricing (cheapest of the three)
  • Quick one-click workflow templates
  • Good for saving time on setup

If you’re building straightforward automations (e.g., form → CRM → email), Integrately gets the job done without overcomplicating anything.

What could be better

It’s not built for complex, multi-branch scenarios. Also, while the app directory is growing fast, it’s still smaller than Zapier’s.


🧠 Which Tool Should You Choose?

Here’s a simple rule of thumb:

✔ Choose Zapier if:

  • You want the easiest possible automation experience
  • You need the biggest library of integrations
  • You prefer stability over complexity

✔ Choose Make if:

  • You’re building advanced workflows
  • You want full automation control
  • You love visual builders

✔ Choose Integrately if:

  • You’re on a tight budget
  • You want basic automations done quickly
  • You don’t need advanced logic

Leave a Comment